CD5(-) CD8-ALPHA-BETA INTESTINAL INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES (IEL) ARE INDUCED TO EXPRESS CD5 UPON ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC ACTIVATION - CD5(-) ANDCD5(-ALPHA-BETA IEL DO NOT REPRESENT SEPARATE T-CELL LINEAGES() CD8)
S. Muller et al., CD5(-) CD8-ALPHA-BETA INTESTINAL INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES (IEL) ARE INDUCED TO EXPRESS CD5 UPON ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC ACTIVATION - CD5(-) ANDCD5(-ALPHA-BETA IEL DO NOT REPRESENT SEPARATE T-CELL LINEAGES() CD8), European Journal of Immunology, 27(7), 1997, pp. 1756-1761
We followed alpha beta T cell receptor (TCR) usage in subsets of gut i
ntraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) in major histocompatibility complex c
lass I-restricted alpha beta TCR-transgenic (tg) mice. The proportion
of tg alpha beta TCR(+)CD8 alpha beta IEL is reduced compared with CD8
(+) splenocytes of the same animal, particularly under conventional co
nditions of maintenance. Further fractionation of CD8 alpha beta IEL a
ccording to the expression level of surface CD5 revealed that in conve
ntionally housed animals tg TCR(+)CD5(-)CD8 alpha beta IEL are as freq
uent as in specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice, whereas tg TCR(+)CD5(int
) or, even more pronounced, tg TCR(+)CD5(hi)CD8 alpha beta IEL are gre
atly diminished when compared with mice kept under SPF conditions. Upo
n antigen-specific stimulation of CD5(-)CD8 alpha beta IEL in vitro, C
D5 surface expression is up-regulated on a large fraction of cells wit
hin 48 h. Up-regulation of CD5 surface expression is further enhanced
by the presence of the anti-alpha IEL monoclonal antibody 2E7. This cl
early demonstrates that CD5(-), and CD5(+)CD8 alpha beta IEL cannot be
considered as separate T cell lineages.