Morbidity and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Objective: To find out whether a threefold increase in follow up (median 10 8 compared with 36 months) influenced major morbidity and functional outcom e between the first 32 and the last 32 patients consecutively operated on w ith J-pouch ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis from 1984 to 1997. Design: Retrospective and prospective study. Setting: University hospital, Norway. Patients: 64 patients with ulcerative colitis who had proctocolectomy and i leal pouch-anal anastomoses. Interventions: The pouches were mainly hand anastomosed (n = 61) to the den tate line after mucosectomy or anastomosed by double stapling technique wit hout mucosectomy (n = 3). The 58 patients who still had their pouches respo nded to a questionnaire on functional outcome and satisfaction. Main outcome measures: Morbidity, functional outcome, and patients' satisfa ction. Results: Major morbidity in these 64 patients comprised pelvic sepsis in 3 (5%), operation for intestinal obstruction in 5 (8%), pouchitis in 12 (19%) , fistulas in 7 (11%) and pouch excision in 6 (9%). Thirteen patients (20%) had 35 reoperations and 11 patients (17%) had 22 re-laparotomies. Then wer e more complications among the first 32 patients with the longest follow up than among the last 32 patients, but this difference was significant only concerning the rate of reoperations (31% compared with 9%) because of the h igher number of pouch excisions (5 compared with 1) in this group. There we re no significant differences in the functional outcome and degree of patie nt satisfaction between the first 29 and the last 29 patients. Respective v alues for 24 hour median stool freqency were 7.0 and 6.3, leakage of stool 48% and 38%, ability to defer defaecation 86% and 97%, perineal irritation 59% and 48%, use of antidiarrhoeal medication 55% and 52%, and wearing of p ad 28% and 38%. Sexual life (n = 57) was improved in 11 (19%) and reduced i n 7 (12%). Potency was reduced in 5 (15%) and ejaculation in 4 (12%), one o f whom (3%) had retrograde ejaculation. Three (5%) received disability pens ions and five (9%) had reduced workload. After the pouch operation 48 (91%) felt better and 3 (6%) felt worse because of frequent bowel emptying, peri neal eczema, or pouch fistula. Conclusion: Continence-preserving proctocolectomy carries considerable morb idity, but the long term functional outcome is satisfactory and does not se em to deteriorate substantially.