Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

Citation
M. Fluker et al., Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, FERT STERIL, 75(1), 2001, pp. 38-45
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
ISSN journal
00150282 → ACNP
Volume
75
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
38 - 45
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(200101)75:1<38:EASOGA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance of ganirelix acetate for the inhibition of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Design: Phase III, multicenter, open-label randomized trial. Setting: In vitro fertilization (IVF) centers in North America. Patient(s): Healthy female partners (n = 313) in subfertile couples for who m COH and IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were indicated. Intervention(s): Patients were randomized to receive one COH cycle with gan irelix or the reference treatment, a long protocol of leuprolide acetate in conjunction with follitropin-beta for injection. Outcome Measure(s): Number of oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rates, endocrine variables, and safety variables. Result(s): The mean number of oocytes retrieved per attempt was 11.6 in the ganirelix group and 14.1 in the leuprolide group. Fertilization rates were 62.4% and 61.9% in the ganirelix and leuprolide groups, respectively, and implantation rates were 21.1% and 26.1%. Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rat es per attempt were 35.4% and 30.8% in the ganirelix group and 38.4% and 36 .4% in the leuprolide acetate group. Fewer moderate and severe injection si te reactions were reported with ganirelix (11.9% and 0.6%) than with leupro lide (24.4% and 1.1%). Conclusion(s): Ganirelix is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Compared w ith leuprolide acetate, ganirelix therapy has a shorter duration and fewer injections but produces a similar pregnancy rate. (C) 2001 by American Soci ety for Reproductive Medicine.