Background: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is generally indicated for the
management of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with upper
gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage but its impact in community practice has n
ot been measured. Thus, the effectiveness of 3 EGD factors, viz., accurate
initial diagnosis, performance within 24 hours of admission (early EGD), an
d appropriate intervention, was examined.
Methods: Records of 214 patients admitted to the ICU of 10 metropolitan hos
pitals with upper GI hemorrhage were reviewed. Unadjusted and severity-adju
sted associations of the 3 EGD factors with length of hospital stay, length
of ICU stay, readmission to ICU, recurrent bleeding, surgery, and death we
re evaluated.
Results: Inaccurate diagnosis occurred in 10% of patients at initial EGD an
d was associated with significant increases in risk of recurrent bleeding (
70% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), rate of surgery (20% vs. 4%, p < 0.05), length of
hospital stay (median 7.5 vs. 5 days, p < 0.005), length of ICU stay (media
n 4 vs. 2 days, p < 0.005), and rate of readmission to ICU (20% vs. 0.6%, p
< 0.001). These associations persisted after adjusting for severity of ill
ness. Early EGD performed in 82% of patients was associated with significan
t severity-adjusted reductions in hospital (-33%: 95% CI [-45%, -18%]) and
ICU (-20%: 95% CI [-24%, -3%]) stay. Appropriate intervention at initial EG
D, performed in 84% of patients, was associated with reductions in severity
-adjusted length of ICU stay (-18%: 95% CI [-32%, 0%]) and rate of recurren
t bleeding (odds ratio = 0.37, 95% CI [0.13, 1.06]).
Conclusions: Early, accurate EGD with appropriate therapeutic intervention
is effective as practiced in the community and is associated with improved
outcomes for patients with upper GI hemorrhage admitted to the ICU. Inaccur
ate diagnosis at initial EGD is uncommon but has a significant adverse asso
ciation with all outcome measures.