We construct new Love and Rayleigh wave phase velocity models based on meas
urements made from an aspherical starting model and strict data quality con
trol derived from cluster analyses. These new models are in good agreement
with previous ones and the question arises whether the slight changes show
an improved capacity to explain the data. To this effect, we propose an obj
ective method to compare different phase velocity models published in recen
t literature. The method is based on comparing calculated synthetics to raw
seismograms. We find a reassuring convergence, between all the models we t
ested, at the longest periods and more scatter at the shorter periods. At 4
0 s, the different models show gains of up to 3.5 cycles over PREM. General
ly, the higher the gain over PREM, the smaller the period considered, which
confirms that the Earth's heterogeneity is strongest in the uppermost part
s of the Earth. Apart from assessing different models against each other, o
ur method gives an estimate, comparable to cluster analyses, of the underly
ing data errors that went into the construction of the models themselves. M
oreover, ray coverage is still far from perfect for constructing phase velo
city models. As a result, we find that without precaution, degree zero is b
iased through spectral leakage by 0.1 to 0.2 per cent with respect to PREM.