TURBULENT KINETIC-ENERGY BUDGETS FROM A LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF AIR-FLOW ABOVE AND WITHIN A FOREST CANOPY

Citation
Mj. Dwyer et al., TURBULENT KINETIC-ENERGY BUDGETS FROM A LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF AIR-FLOW ABOVE AND WITHIN A FOREST CANOPY, Boundary - layer meteorology, 84(1), 1997, pp. 23-43
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN journal
00068314
Volume
84
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
23 - 43
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8314(1997)84:1<23:TKBFAL>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The output of a large-eddy simulation was used to study the terms of t he turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) budget for the air layers above and within a forest. The computation created a three-dimensional, time-dep endent simulation of the airflow, in which the lowest third of the dom ain was occupied by drag elements and heat sources to represent the fo rest. Shear production was a principal source of TKE in the upper cano py, diminishing gradually above tree-top height and more sharply with depth in the canopy. The transfer of energy to subgrid scales (dissipa tion) was the main sink in the upper part of the domain but diminished rapidly with depth in the canopy. Removal of resolved-scale TKE due t o canopy drag was extremely important, occurring primarily in the uppe r half of the forest where the foliage density was large. Turbulent tr ansport showed a loss at the canopy top and a gain within the canopy. These general features have been found elsewhere but uncertainty remai ns concerning the effects of pressure transport. In the present work, pressure was calculated directly, allowing us to compute the pressure diffusion term. Well above the canopy, pressure transport was smaller than, and opposite in sign to, the turbulent transport term. Near the canopy top and below, pressure transport acted in concert with turbule nt transport to export TKE from the region immediately above and withi n the upper crown, and to provide turbulent energy for the lower parts of the forest. In combination, the transport terms accounted for over half of the TKE loss near the canopy top, and in the lowest two-third s of the canopy the transport terms were the dominant source terms in the budget. Moreover, the pressure transport was the largest source of turbulent kinetic energy in the lowest levels of the canopy, being pa rticularly strong under convective conditions. These results indicate that pressure transport is important in the plant canopy turbulent kin etic energy budget, especially in the lowest portion of the stand, whe re it acts as the major driving force for turbulent motions.