Z. Rotstein et al., Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: development and validation of the 'RAYS' Scale and comparison with the SF-36, INT J QUAL, 12(6), 2000, pp. 511-517
Objective. To develop a self-administered rating scale for quantifying qual
ity of life (QoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
Methods. The RAYS scale items were derived from a source of 600 questions c
omposed by our Centre's experts from commonly used instruments that assess
physical, psychological, and social-familiar dimensions. Prior to finalizat
ion of the RAYS QoL, candidate items were administered to 15 health rehabil
itation professionals. Clarity, importance, relevance and specificity were
graded for each item by every professional independently. Items chosen for
the final version were graded as good or excellent on all these aspects. Th
e Medical Outcome Study Short Form-3G (SF-36) was used to compare health ap
praisal with the RAYS scale.
Results. Each of the three subscales of the RAYS covers a different dimensi
on (physical, psychological, and social-familial) and each includes 15 self
-report items scored from 1 (best) to 4 (worse), focusing on the preceding
week. Validation was achieved through administration of the scale to 50 ran
domly selected MS patients and to 50 age-, sex-, education- and family stat
us-matched healthy controls. All RAYS dimensions among MS patients reached
a Cronbach's coefficient alpha >0.8. Mean values for all dimensions were gr
eater in patients than in controls (P< 0.002). Patients scored below norms
for the general population in the majority of the SF-36 subscales ton avera
ge 32% lower). Significant correlation was found between the two scales esp
ecially in the physical and social functioning subscales.
Conclusion. The RAYS scale demonstrated high internal consistency and signi
ficant discriminative value, and is thus a suitable disease-specific tool f
or measuring QoL in MS.