H. Kurata et al., Paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin is less effective for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization, INT J GYN C, 10(6), 2000, pp. 459-462
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of paclitaxel in co
mbination with cisplatin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)
for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Twenty-seven
patients with gynecological cancer received paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP, n
= 9) or other platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 18) (etoposide and cisplati
n [n = 5]; cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and cisplatin [n = 8]; or pepleomy
cin, etoposide, and cysplatin [n = 5]). Each combination was followed by G-
CSF. The mean number of colony-forming unit granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM)
/kg and CD34(+) cells/kg collected per cycle was 1.2 x 10(5) ind 0.8 x 10(6
) after the TP regimen, compared with 2.6 x 10(5) (P < 0.05) and 2.0 x 10(6
) for patients who received other platinum-based chemotherapy. The CFU-GM t
arget yield (<greater than or equal to>1.0 x 10(5)/kg) was achieved in 56%
and 83% patients in the TP and comparison group, respectively. With the TP
regimen, a younger age (less than or equal to 50 years of age) and fewer pr
ior chemotherapy cycles (less than or equal to2) were associated with the C
FU-CM targeted yield (<0.05). In conclusion, TP mobilized PBPC less effecti
vely than other platinum-based chemotherapy. Therefore, the TP regimen may
need to be changed to another appropriate regimen when PBPC mobilization is
planned for high-dose chemotherapy in gynecological cancer patients.