Comparison of nebulized particle size distribution with Malvern laser diffraction analyzer versus Andersen Cascade Impactor and low-flow marple personal cascade impactor
Wtj. Kwong et al., Comparison of nebulized particle size distribution with Malvern laser diffraction analyzer versus Andersen Cascade Impactor and low-flow marple personal cascade impactor, J AEROSOL M, 13(4), 2000, pp. 303-314
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG
Particle size of nebulized aerosols can be measured directly using laser di
ffraction or by evaluating aerodynamic properties by cascade impaction. As
of today, there are no generally accepted standards for measuring particle
size distribution from nebulizers. Laser diffraction has been questioned be
cause of potential evaporative losses of the small particles at the edge of
the plume, causing an apparent shift in the particle size distribution and
thus a larger mass median diameter (MMD). When particle-sizing wet aerosol
s, cascade impaction may give rise to an apparent shift in the distribution
, resulting in a smaller mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) due to eva
porative losses of aerosol droplets as they enter the impactor at ambient t
emperature. The modified low-flow Marple 296 Personal Cascade Impactor (MPC
I) is currently being proposed as the European standard for wet aerosol ana
lysis to minimize evaporative losses during sampling. The present study com
pared the particle size distribution of salbutamol and sodium cromoglycate
aerosols nebulized by the Pari LC Star, using laser diffraction (Malvern Ma
stersizer X; MMX) and cascade impaction (Andersen Cascade Impactor [ACI] an
d the commercially available MPCI), which was either at ambient temperature
or cooled to the nebulized aerosol temperature (10 degreesC). MMDs obtaine
d with the MMX were virtually identical to the MMADs measured with both imp
actors when cooled with no significant differences in geometric standard de
viation (sigma (g)). When the impactors were operated at ambient temperatur
e, MMADs were smaller (18 to 30%) with a significantly larger sigma (g) (p
< 0.05) compared to the MMX. These findings suggest that droplet distributi
on data for wet aerosol where evaporation process has not been minimized mu
st be viewed with caution. There was no evidence suggesting a significant e
vaporative loss of small droplets from the edge of the plume during laser p
article sizing. The MPCI does not minimize evaporative losses of aerosol pa
rticles during sampling.