Pulmonary function response to EDTA, an additive in nebulized bronchodilators

Citation
Mj. Asmus et al., Pulmonary function response to EDTA, an additive in nebulized bronchodilators, J ALLERG CL, 107(1), 2001, pp. 68-72
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
ISSN journal
00916749 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
68 - 72
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-6749(200101)107:1<68:PFRTEA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Background: Some nebulized bronchodilator solutions contain additives, such as EDTA, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), or bath. Objective: Although BAG-induced bronchoconstriction has been well documente d in patients with asthma, there is no information on the effects of EDTA o n FEV1 when inhaled in the amounts that would be administered during emerge ncy department treatment of asthma, Methods: Eighteen subjects with stable asthma and airway responsiveness to methacholine were randomly assigned to inhale up to four 600-mug nebulized doses of EDTA, BAC (positive control), and normal saline (placebo) in a dou ble-blind crossover manner on separate days. FEV1 was measured 15 minutes a fter each dose. Treatments were repeated every 20 minutes until FEV1 decrea sed by 20% or greater or a maximum of 4 doses were administered. Results: Mean +/- SD maximum percent decrease in FEV1 was 1.8% +/- 5.8% aft er EDTA, 16.6% +/- 13.9% after BAG, and 3.6% +/- 8.2% after placebo (P <.00 1); there was no significant difference between EDTA and placebo. Conclusion: The amount of EDTA contained in maximum recommended doses of ne bulized bronchodilators does not induce bronchospasm. In contrast, BAC indu ces clinically important bronchospasm, which could decrease the efficacy of a bronchodilator during an emergency.