Candidate gene analysis for loci affecting litter size and ovulation rate in swine

Citation
Rc. Linville et al., Candidate gene analysis for loci affecting litter size and ovulation rate in swine, J ANIM SCI, 79(1), 2001, pp. 60-67
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218812 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
60 - 67
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(200101)79:1<60:CGAFLA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
A candidate gene approach was used to determine whether specific loci expla in responses in ovulation rate (OR) and number of fully formed (FF), live ( NBA), stillborn, and mummified pigs at birth observed in two lines selected for ovulation rate and litter size compared with a randomly selected contr ol line. Line IOL was selected for an index of OR and embryonic survival fo r eight generations, followed by eight generations of two-stage selection f or OR and litter size. Line C was selected at random for 16 generations. Li ne COL, derived from line C at Generation 8, underwent eight generations of two-stage selection. Lines IOL and C differed in mean EBV by 6.1 ova and 4 .7 FF, whereas lines COL and C differed by 2.2 ova and 2.9 FF. Pigs of Gene ration 7 of two-stage selection lines were genotyped for the retinol bindin g protein 4 (RBP4, n = 190) and epidermal growth factor (EGF, n = 189) loci , whereas pigs of Generations 7 and 8 were genotyped for the estrogen recep tor (ESR, n = 523), prolactin receptor (PRLR, n = 524), follicle-stimulatin g hormone beta (FSH beta, n = 520), and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2, n = 523) loci. Based on chi-square analysis for homogeneity of g enotypic frequencies, distributions for PRLR, FSH beta, and PTGS2 were diff erent among lines (P < 0.005). Differences in gene frequencies between IOL vs C and COL vs C were 0.33 +/- 0.25 and 0.16 +/- 0.26 for PRLR, 0.35 +/- 0 .20 and 0.15 +/- 0.24 for FSH<beta>, and 0.16 +/- 0.16 and 0.08 +/- 0.18 fo r PTCS2. Although these differences are consistent with a model of selectio n acting on these loci, estimates of additive and dominance effects at thes e loci did not differ from zero (P > 0.05), and several of them had signs i nconsistent with the changes in allele frequencies. We were not able to fin d significant associations between the polymorphic markers and phenotypes s tudied; however, we cannot rule out that other genetic variation within the se candidate genes has an effect on the traits studied.