Effect of ruminal vs postruminal administration of degradable protein on utilization of low-quality forage by beef steers

Citation
Ca. Bandyk et al., Effect of ruminal vs postruminal administration of degradable protein on utilization of low-quality forage by beef steers, J ANIM SCI, 79(1), 2001, pp. 225-231
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218812 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
225 - 231
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(200101)79:1<225:EORVPA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
An experiment was designed to determine the effects of ruminal and postrumi nal infusions of ruminally degradable protein (casein) on intake and digest ion of low-quality hay by beef steers. Twelve ruminally fistulated Angus x Hereford steers (initial BW = 563 kg) were blocked by weight and assigned t o one of three treatments: control (C; hay only) or hay plus ruminal (R) or postruminal (P) infusion of 400 g/d of sodium caseinate. The trial consist ed of five periods: 1) 10-d adaptation to the hay diet; 2) 7-d measurement of hay intake (without infusions); 3) 10-d adaptation to protein infusion t reatments (intake measurements continued); 4) 7-d measurement of hay intake and digestibility (infusions continued); and 5) 3-d ruminal sampling perio d (infusions continued). Steers were given ad libitum access to tallgrass-p rairie hay (3.4% CP, 76.6% NDF) throughout the study. Casein was administer ed once daily before feeding, either directly into the rumen or via anchore d infusion lines into the abomasum. Hay intake was increased by supplementa tion (P < 0.01). Ruminal infusion elicited a greater (P = 0.04) increase in hay intake than postruminal infusion. Intake tended (P = 0.11) to be lower in period 4 than in period 2 for control steers but was greater in period 4 than in period 2 (P <less than or equal to> 0.03) for both R and P steers . The increase in intake between periods 2 and 4 was greater for R than for P steers (P = 0.03). Supplementation improved diet OM digestion (P = 0.04) but not NDF digestion (P = 0.18); however, greater relative error for NDF digestion may have limited the ability to elucidate significant treatment e ffects. There were no differences in either OM digestion (P = 0.42) or NDF digestion (P = 0.35) between R and P steers. Plasma urea N at 0 and 3 h aft er feeding on the last day of the experiment was lower (P = 0.05) for C tha n for R and P steers, but no difference (P = 0.48) was evident between R an d P steers. Ruminal ammonia N levels also were increased by supplementation (P < 0.01), with a much larger increase for R than for P steers (P < 0.01) . Total VFA concentrations were not affected (P = 0.21) by treatment, but R steers exhibited lower proportions of acetate and higher proportions of is obutyrate, valerate, and isovalerate than P steers (P < 0.01). In conclusio n, ruminal and postruminal infusion of a degradable protein source improved forage utilization, although the response in forage OM intake and total di gestible OM. intake was greater for ruminal infusion than for postruminal i nfusion.