The generalized gravity wave-airglow interaction theory presented in the fi
rst paper of this two part series by Wang et al. (2001) is further develope
d for comparisons with observations. As a counterpart of Krassovsky's airgl
ow intensity-to-temperature ratio eta, we propose the ratio of the line-of-
sight (LOS) perturbation wind to the intensity, eta (w) The behaviors of th
ese ratios are determined by the intrinsic wave frequency, rather than the
observed frequency. The Doppler-shifting effects are investigated and found
to be quite important. For a given observed frequency, an increasing (decr
easing) magnitude and phase angle of eta is generally expected, in response
to the downward (upward) Doppler-shifting of the intrinsic frequencies for
the waves propagating along (against) a mean flow. In a wind-temperature-s
tratified atmosphere, the magnitude of eta may vary by a factor of similar
to2 or more, with larger values corresponding to small-scale waves, and the
phase angles may change by similar to 40-90 degrees, with larger values oc
curring for either large-scale or very small-scale wave modes. For eta (w)
which is proportional to 1/eta its Doppler response generally exhibits a te
ndency opposite to that of eta. These ratios are also dependent on zenith a
ngle theta, at which observations are made. Ln particular, theta -dependenc
e of eta (w) is primarily controlled by different contributions of horizont
al and vertical motions to the LOS wind. For limb scans, small-scale gravit
y waves with relatively large vertical perturbation velocities are shown to
play an important role in producing the observed large airglow intensity v
ariations. In order to explore the importance, we simulate the green line a
irglow images observed by WINDII, the WIND Imaging Interferometer on the Up
per Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS), by numerically integrating the Mi
chelson equation of the instrument. The model-calculated ratios and simulat
ed images are compared with realistic observations from the ground and spac
e in good agreements. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.