Background: High-energy trauma to the lower extremity presents challenges w
ith regard to reconstruction and rehabilitation. Failed efforts at limb sal
vage are associated with increased patient mortality and high hospital cost
s. Lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems were developed to assist
the surgical team with the initial decision to amputate or salvage a limb.
The purpose of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the clinica
l utility of five lower-extremity injury-severity scoring systems.
Methods: Five hundred and fifty-six high-energy lower-extremity injuries we
re prospectively evaluated with use of five injury-severity scoring systems
for lower-extremity trauma designed to assist in the decision-making proce
ss for the care of patients with such injuries. Four hundred and seven limb
s remained in the salvage pathway six months after the injury. The sensitiv
ity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curv
e were calculated for the Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS); the Limb
Salvage Index (LSI); the Predictive Salvage index (PSI); the Nerve injury
Ischemia, Soft-Tissue Injury, Skeletal Injury, Shock, and Age of Patient Sc
ore (NISSSA); and the Hannover Fracture Scale-97 (HFS-97) for ischemic and
nonischemic limbs. The scores were analyzed in two ways: including and excl
uding limbs that required immediate amputation.
Results: The analysis did not validate the clinical utility of any of the l
ower-extremity injury-severity scores. The high specificity of the scores i
n all of the patient subgroups did confirm that low scores could be used to
predict limb-salvage potential. The converse, however, was not true. The l
ow sensitivity of the indices failed to support the validity of the scores
as predictors of amputation.
Conclusions: Lower-extremity injury-severity scores at or above the amputat
ion threshold should be cautiously used by a surgeon who must decide the fa
te of a lower extremity with a high-energy injury.