This paper presents the findings of an evaluation of a local clinical super
vision scheme for practice nurses in Leicestershire, UK.
A baseline and a follow-up postal questionnaire were sent to all practice n
urses (including supervisors) and general practice senior partners to find
out how far the objectives of the local scheme had been met during the firs
t year of implementation. Two focus groups gathered qualitative data about
the process of implementation.
Twelve months after implementation 12% of practice nurses and over two thir
ds of GPs reported that they were unaware of the scheme. Forty-three percen
t of practice nurses did not know who their local supervisor was; most repo
rted that they would like to have known.
Eighteen percent of practice nurses reported uptake of supervision through
the local scheme. The benefits of involvement were professional development
tailored to individual learning needs and regular opportunities to share w
ork-related problems with peers; about a third reported benefits for the pr
actice as well.
The existing availability of peer support and time needed to undertake clin
ical supervision were common reasons given for non-involvement in the schem
e. Misconceptions about the purpose of clinical supervision presented furth
er obstacles.
At follow-up over half of the practice nurses remained undecided about thei
r future involvement in the scheme. If the benefits associated with clinica
l supervision are to be realized, the obstacles that currently hinder pract
ice nurses' involvement need addressing.