Lc. Chen et al., Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between valproic acid and a traditional Chinese medicine, Paeoniae Radix, in healthy volunteers, J CLIN PH T, 25(6), 2000, pp. 453-459
Background and objective: In addition to the standard antiepileptic drugs,
traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) are used for the treatment of epilepsy
in oriental countries. The interactions between antiepileptic drugs and TC
Ms represent a potential problem in clinical application. Because valproic
acid (VPA), one of the most widely prescribed antiepileptic drugs, may be a
dministered concomitantly with Paeoniae Radix (PR), one of the famous TCMs,
in some epileptic patients, the present study was conducted to evaluate th
e influences of PR on the pharmacokinetics of VPA.
Method: The pharmacokinetics of VPA were investigated in a randomized, open
-label, two-way crossover study, Six healthy volunteers received the follow
ing treatments in a crossover design: (i) 1.2 g extract powder of Paeoniae
Radix once daily for 7 days and one 200 mg VPA gastro-resistant tablet on d
ay 7 and (ii) one 200 mg VPA gastro-resistant tablet alone on day 7. Serial
plasma samples were obtained on day 7. Total and free (unbound) VPA plasma
concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (F
PIA). Safety measures included laboratory tests (haematology, serum chemist
ry and urinalysis) and adverse event monitoring. Statistical comparisons of
pharmacokinetic parameters were performed with the Student paired t-test.
Results: Overall clinical safety was satisfactory. The mean maximum plasma
concentration of VPA was attained at within 6 h after oral administration o
f VPA alone and 3-4 h after oral administration of VPA in combination with
PR. The plasma level of VPA declined with a half-life of 11.71 and 11.91 h,
respectively. No statistically significant difference was obtained in any
of the pharmacokinetic parameters (T-max, C-max, AUC, t(1/2), MRT, CL/F and
V-d/F) of VPA between the two treatments. Also, there was no significant d
ifference in the protein binding rates of VPA.
Conclusion: PR did not significantly affect the absorption, distribution, m
etabolism and elimination of VPA in healthy volunteers.