It is well known that most of the standard specification tests are not vali
d when the alternative hypothesis is misspecified. This is particularly tru
e in the error component model, when one tests for either random effects or
serial correlation without taking account of the presence of the other eff
ect. In this paper we study the size and power of the standard Rao's score
tests analytically and by simulation when the data are contaminated by loca
l misspecification. These tests are adversely affected under misspecificati
on. We suggest simple procedures to test for random effects (or serial corr
elation) in the presence of local serial correlation (or random effects), a
nd these tests require ordinary least-squares residuals only. Our Monte Car
lo results demonstrate that the suggested tests have good finite sample pro
perties for local misspecification, and in some cases even for far distant
misspecification. Our tests are also capable of detecting the right directi
on of the departure from the null hypothesis. We also provide some empirica
l illustrations to highlight the usefulness of our tests. (C) 2001 Elsevier
Science S.A. All rights reserved. JEL classification: C12; C23; C52.