This paper describes a webometric analysis of the linkages (or 'sitations')
to websites associated with departments of librarianship and information s
cience (LIS). Some of the observed sitation counts appear counter-intuitive
and there is only a very limited correlation with peer evaluations of rese
arch performance, with many of the sitations being from pages that are far
removed in subject matter from LIS. Our conclusions are that sitation data
are not well suited to the quantitative evaluation of the research status o
f LIS departments and that departments can best boost their web visibility
by hosting as wide a range of types of material as possible.