The hypothesis of cognitive theories of hypervigilance for signs of danger
in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) was tested with the emotional Stro
op task. BPD patients (n = 15), Cluster C personality disorder (PD) patient
s (n = 12), and nonpatient controls (n = 15) diagnosed with SCID-I and SCID
-II interviews color-named emotional and nonemotional words presented in th
ree colors on a personal computer screen, first in a subliminal condition (
words presented for a very short, individually calibrated time followed by
a mask to prevent conscious recognition of the word) and then in a supralim
inal condition. Four classes of negative words were used, including three c
lasses of BPD-specific words (negative views of others, sexual abuse-relate
d words, negative self-descriptors) and one class of general negative words
that was unrelated to BPD pathology. In contrast to the nonpatient control
s, both BPD and Cluster C patients showed interference caused by supralimin
ally presented emotional words. There was no difference between the clinica
l groups and there was no evidence for specificity of the effect for certai
n stimulus classes. The subliminal Stroop failed to yield any significant e
ffect. Results are interpreted as evidence for the presence of a relatively
crude hypervigilance for any emotionally negative stimulus in both BPD and
Cluster C PDs.