PURPOSE: There are many different excimer laser devices available for photo
ablative refractive surgery. Smoothness of ablation may vary with different
excimer lasers systems.
METHODS: Ablations were performed on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) plates o
f 8 x 4 x 0.5 cm, with four different excimer lasers: VISX-Star, Coherent S
chwind Keratom I/II, Chiron Technolas Keracor 117C (Plano Scan), and the Ni
dek EC-5000, to determine and compare the homogeneity and smoothness of the
surface. Ten -3.00 D samples, ten -6.00 D samples, and ten -9.00 D samples
were ablated with each laser. The PMMA discs were examined with optical mi
croscopy, documented by photographs, and each sample was measured quantitat
ively using a Hommel-Werkel rugosimeter. We used the same PMMA material thr
oughout.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in smoothness were found bet
ween the Chiron Technolas 117C and the VISX-Star, Nidek and VISX-Star, and
Coherent Schwind and VISX-Star in the homogeneities achieved by ablating -3
.00 D. Ablations of -6.00 D resulted in homogeneities that were statistical
ly significantly different: Chiron Technolas 117C with the other three devi
ces, the Nidek EC-5000 with the VISX-Star, and the Coherent-Schwind with th
e VISX-Star. In the ablations for -9.00 D, statistically significant differ
ences in homogeneity were found between the Chiron Technolas 117C and Nidek
, between the Chiron and VISX-Star, between the Coherent Schwind and VISX-S
tar, and between the Nidek and VISX-Star. The laser with the scanning spot
system was smoother.
CONCLUSION: Scanning spot technology produced smooth ablations even up to -
9.00 D.