The mechanical behaviour of xerogels and aerogels is generally described in
terms of brittle and elastic materials, like glasses or ceramics. The main
difference compared to silica glass is the order of magnitude of the elast
ic and rupture moduli which are 10(4) times lower. However, if this analogy
is pertinent when gels are under a tension stress (bending test) they exhi
bit a more complicated response when the structure is submitted to a compre
ssive stress. The network is linearly elastic under small strains, then exh
ibits yield followed by densification and plastic hardening. As a consequen
ce of the plastic shrinkage it is possible to densify and stiffen the gel a
t room temperature. These opposite behaviours (elastic and plastic) are sur
prisingly related to the same two kinds of gel features: the silanol conten
t and the pore volume. Both elastic modulus and plastic shrinkage depend st
rongly on the volume fraction of pores and on the condensation reaction bet
ween silanols. On the mechanical point of view (rupture modulus and toughne
ss), it is shown that pores and silanols play also an important role. Pores
can be considered as flaws in the terms of fracture mechanics and the flaw
size, calculated from rupture strength and toughness is related to the por
e size distribution. Different kinds of gels structure (fractal or not frac
tal) have been synthesized by a control of the different steps of transform
ation such as sintering and plastic compaction. The relationships between s
tructural and the elastic properties are discussed in terms of the percolat
ion theory and fractal structure.