R. Irimescu et al., Comparison of acyl donors for lipase-catalyzed production of 1,3-dicapryloyl-2-eicosapentaenoylglycerol, J AM OIL CH, 78(1), 2001, pp. 65-70
Synthesis of 1,3-dicapryloyl-2-eicosapentaenoyl glycerol (CEC) catalyzed by
Lipozyme IM (immobilized Rhizomucor miehui lipase) was performed by intere
sterification of trieicosapentaenoylglycerol (ECD with caprylic acid ICA) (
acidolysis) and EEE with ethyl caprylate (EtC) (interesterification). Both
methods involved two steps: (i) transesterification at an optimized water c
ontent and temperature for the high yield conversion of the substrate to CE
C, 1-capryloyl-2-eicosaptatacnoylglycerol (CEOH) and 2-eicosapentaenoylglyc
erol (OHEOH), and (ii) reesterification of CEOH and OHEOH to CEC by water r
emoval under reduced pressure. Interesterification had clear advantages ove
r acidolysis. The reaction rates for interesterification were higher and th
e reaction times shorter. The final yield of CEC by interesterification was
higher, and the extent of acyl migration, indicated by the tricapryloylgly
cerol content, was lower. The disadvantage of the higher price of EtC used
for interesterification (approximately 10 times higher than the price of CA
) was overcome by synthesizing it directly in the same reaction vessel prio
r to the interesterification step. EtC was rapidly synthesized by esterific
ation of CA with ethanol in high yield (92% obtained in 2.5 h). The amount
of water added to the reaction mixture and the reaction temperature influen
ced the yields of CEC, CEOH, and OHEOH in the transesterification step for
both interesterification and acidolysis methods. The regioisomeric purity o
f CEC was 100% for both methods at temperatures of 40 degreesC or less. The
highest yield of CEC (81%) was obtained for the interesterification of EEE
with EtC, formed directly in the same reaction vessel, at a CA/EEE molar r
atio of 20:1 and 30 degreesC.