EFFECT OF MEASUREMENT CO2 CONCENTRATION ON SUGAR MAPLE ROOT RESPIRATION

Citation
Aj. Burton et al., EFFECT OF MEASUREMENT CO2 CONCENTRATION ON SUGAR MAPLE ROOT RESPIRATION, Tree physiology, 17(7), 1997, pp. 421-427
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology,Forestry,"Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
0829318X
Volume
17
Issue
7
Year of publication
1997
Pages
421 - 427
Database
ISI
SICI code
0829-318X(1997)17:7<421:EOMCCO>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Accurate estimates of root respiration are crucial to predicting below ground C cycling in forest ecosystems. Inhibition of respiration has b een reported as a short-term response of plant tissue to elevated meas urement [CO2]. We sought to determine if measurement [CO2] affected ro ot respiration in samples from mature sugar maple (Acer saccharum Mars h.) forests and to assess possible errors associated with root respira tion measurements made at [CO2]s lower than that typical of the soil a tmosphere. Root respiration was measured as both CO2 production and O- 2 consumption on excised fine roots (less than or equal to 1.0 mm) at [CO2]s ranging from 350 to > 20,000 mu l l(-1). Root respiration was s ignificantly affected by the [CO2] at which measurements were made for both CO2 production and O-2 consumption. Root respiration was most se nsitive to [CO2] near and below normal soil concentrations (< 1500 mu l l(-1)). Respiration rates changed little at [CO2]s above 3000 mu l l (-1) and were essentially constant above 6000 mu l l(-1) CO2. These fi ndings call into question estimates of root respiration made at or nea r atmospheric [CO2], suggesting that they overestimate actual rates in the soil. Our results indicate that sugar maple root respiration at a tmospheric [CO2] (350 mu l l(-1)) is about 139% of that at soil [CO2]. Although the causal mechanism remains unknown, the increase in root r espiration at low measurement [CO2] is significant and should be accou nted for when estimating or modeling root respiration. Until the direc t effect of [CO2] on root respiration is fully understood, we recommen d making measurements at a [CO2] representative of, or higher than, so il [CO2]. In all cases, the [CO2] at which measurements are made and t he [CO2] typical of the soil atmosphere should be reported.