Lc. Grubisha et al., Biology of the ectomycorrhizal genus Rhizopogon. V. Phylogenetic relationships in the Boletales inferred from LSU rDNA sequences, MYCOLOGIA, 93(1), 2001, pp. 82-89
The phylogenetic relationship between Alpova, Chroogomphus, Gomphidius, Rhi
zopogon, Suillus, and Truncocolumella and their placement in the Boletales
was tested through maximum parsimony analyses of large subunit nuclear ribo
somal DNA sequences. Taxon sampling included representatives of the genera
Alpova, Boletellus, Boletus, Chroogomphus, Gomphidius, Melanogaster, Paragy
rodon, Phylloporus, Rhizopogon, Suillus, Truncocolumella, Tylopilus, and Xe
rocomus, as well as species from the Agaricales, Russulales, and Polyporale
s. The order Boletales was strongly supported as monophyletic. Furthermore,
within this order, two major groups emerged: the boletoid radiation and a
Melanogastraceae/Paragyrodon sphaerosporus paraphyletic assemblage, and the
suilloid radiation. The boletoid radiation and a Melanogastraceae/Paragyro
don sphaerosporus assemblage was strongly supported. Although the boletoid
radiation was not strongly supported by bootstrap analysis, the clade did n
ot collapse in the strict consensus topology. This clade comprised species
from the genera Boletellus, Boletus, Phylloporus, Tylopilus, and Xerocomus.
The Boletaceae sensu Singer was not monophyletic. Although species relatio
nships within the boletoid radiation were not well resolved, the genus Bole
tus did not appear to be monophyletic. Alpova diplophloeus, A. trappei, Mel
anogaster tuberiformis, and Paragyrodon sphaerosporus formed a paraphyletic
assemblage basal to the boletoid radiation clade. The suilloid clade was s
trongly supported and included Alpova olivaceotinctus, Chroogomphus, Gomphi
dius, Rhizopogon, Suillus and Truncocolumella citrina. Species in the genus
Alpova therefore were grouped both within and outside the suilloid radiati
on. Within the suilloid radiation, Suillus was inferred to be more closely
related to Truncocolumella citrina and the Gomphidiaceae than to Rhizopogon
, suggesting a more distant relationship between Suillus and Rhizopogon tha
n previously hypothesized. Rhizopogon was not supported as monophyletic, al
though its monophyly could not be rejected by the data. Alpova olivaceotinc
tus grouped within the genus Rhizopogon, consistent with previous classific
ations, and is returned to that genus.