NOW NEARLY A DECADE OLD, the original Pew Health Professions Commission Com
petencies have stood up well to the test of time. The competencies were des
igned to provide ail health professionals, from physicians to physical ther
apists, with a general guide to the values, skills, and knowledge they woul
d need to be successful in the health care system that was beginning to eme
rge in the late 1980s. They have been used across the range of health profe
ssions and in many practice settings to create a framework for curricular c
hange. work redesign, and assessment of professional competence.
The interpretation of the competencies offered here should prove to be a us
eful tool to nurses and health system leaders as they carry on the hard wor
k of adapting the current model of nursing practice to the demands and real
ties of the contemporary and continually evolving health care environment.
This work is important Tor two reasons. First, many of the skills and attri
butes of the professional nurse are not adequately used or valued by the he
alth care system because the profession is both fragmented and poorly diffe
rentiated and articulated. Without markers that define and promote collabor
ative practice within nursing,the full potential of nurses at all levels of
preparation will continue to be inadequately and inappropriately deployed.
This model exacerbates the current nursing shortage because it fails to use
nurses in appropriate, well-delineated, and challenging roles. without thi
s kind of differentiation, one that can be owned and supported by all nurse
s, there will continue to be suboptimal use of the nursing workforce in the
United States. The framework of differentiated Pew competencies and the co
mpanion teaching-learning strategies proposed here offer one approach to ra
tionalizing both nursing education and practice, with the potential for imp
roving the quality of care, and reducing fragmentation, cost, and public co
nfusion.