The origin of evolutionary novelty involves changes across the biological h
ierarchy: from genes and cells to whole organisms and ecosystems. Understan
ding the mechanisms behind the establishment of new designs involves integr
ating scientific disciplines that use different data and, often, different
means of testing hypotheses. Discoveries from both paleontology and develop
mental genetics have shed new light on the origin of morphological noveltie
s. The genes that play a major role in establishing the primary axes of the
body and appendages, and that regulate the expression of the genes that ar
e responsible for initiating the making of structures such as eyes, or hear
ts, are highly conserved between phyla. This implies that it is not new gen
es, per se, that underlie much of morphological innovation, but that it is
changes in when and where these and other genes are expressed that constitu
te the underlying mechanistic basis of morphological innovation. Gene dupli
cation is also a source of developmental innovation, but it is possible tha
t it is not the increased number of genes (and their subsequent divergence)
that is most important in the evolution of new morphologies; rather it may
be the duplication of their regulatory regions that provides the raw mater
ial for morphological novelty. Bridging the gap between microevolution and
macroevolution will involve understanding the mechanisms behind the product
ion of morphological variation. It appears that relatively few genetic chan
ges may be responsible for most of the observed phenotypic differences betw
een species, at least in some instances. In addition, advances in our under
standing of the mechanistic basis of animal development offer the opportuni
ty to deepen our insight into the nature of the Cambrian explosion. With th
e advent of whole-genome sequencing, we should see accelerated progress in
understanding the relationship between the genotype, phenotype, and environ
ment: post-genomics paleontology promises to be most exciting.