Harris surveys a number of overlapping debates relating to 'difference' and
the 'public/private' distinction, including: positions that perceive diffe
rences only as labels to secure governmentality; that treat difference as s
omething to be consumed; that accept but confine difference to the private
domain; that attempt to reconcile collective difference to the demands of a
liberal theory of individual rights; that counter this by suggesting a nee
d to rethink the relationship between state and society to allow for the cr
eation of multicultural public forms; that insist that the option of differ
ence should be enlarged to embrace the fundamental differences of economic
inequality; that would see the appeal to cultural differences as only an id
eology that masks the contradictions of modern liberal capitalism; and thos
e, like Harris's own, that want to focus on the multifaceted, interactive a
nd relational nature of difference. Identity and culture, he argues, are ac
hieved processes deriving from a specific praxis of interpretation and enfo
rcement located within the field of historically constituted social relatio
ns shaped by grids of meanings, access to resources and power. Once we give
up the idea of cultures as sealed entities and recognize that even within
cultural boundaries communication is essentially about difference and requi
res translation, then the problematic nature of the constituent elements of
'multiculturalism'-multi-, -cultural-, -ism-renders the whole concept ques
tionable. Undoubtedly, most avowed multiculturalists are committed to some
sense of the 'good' or 'better' society, but it will simply not do to overb
urden the notion of multiculturalism, however radically conceived and well
intentioned, with the task of achieving social justice.