Cm. Birt et al., ANALYSIS OF RELIABILITY INDEXES FROM HUMPHREY VISUAL-FIELD TESTS IN AN URBAN GLAUCOMA POPULATION, Ophthalmology, 104(7), 1997, pp. 1126-1130
Purpose: Visual field assessment is extremely important in glaucoma ma
nagement, but interpretation is affected by the quality of the patient
's performance, The authors have investigated the reliability of visua
l field performance by a randomly selected sample of the chronic glauc
oma population at an urban tertiary care practice. Methods: Patient re
liability in Humphrey automated visual field testing was studied in 10
6 randomly selected chronic open-angle glaucoma patient charts, which
provided 768 tests (mean, 7.2 +/- 4.8 fields; range, 2-18 fields). Rel
iability criteria were established as less than 20% fixation losses, l
ess than 33% false-negative error, and less than 33% false-positive er
ror, as recommended by Humphrey Instruments, Inc (San Leandro, CA). Re
sults: Patients performed reliably in 61% of right eye fields, 58% of
left eye fields, and 59.5% overall. Of the 106 patients, only 35 (33%)
were always reliable in both eyes, whereas 8 (7.5%) were always unrel
iable in both eyes, The most common cause of unreliability was fixatio
n loss (39%), whereas false-positive error (5%) and false-negative err
or (9%) were less frequent. A more severely depressed mean deviation c
orrelated significantly with poorer performance on the three reliabili
ty indices, with false-negative error having the greatest correlation,
followed by fixation loss and false-positive error. Corrected pattern
standard deviation correlated closely only with false-negative error.
Prolonged test time also correlated with all three reliability indice
s. Age was a significant factor for fixation loss but not for false-ne
gative or false-positive error. Conclusions: The authors conclude that
fewer than two thirds of the Humphrey visual fields were reliable wit
h the authors' urban tertiary care population of patients with glaucom
a. Relaxing the fixation loss criterion to less than 33% improved the
rate of reliability to approximately 75%. The severity of glaucomatous
visual field defects, test time, and age were identified as factors i
nfluencing the reliability of the Humphrey visual fields.