Background: Laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) has failed to m
atch the success rates of external DCR. It has been suggested that thi
s technology may be best suited for revision of failed DCR cases. The
authors prospectively evaluated the efficacy of transcanalicular laser
-assisted revision DCR (TCLARDCR). Methods: A neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) l
aser was used for transcanalicular revision of 24 failed DCRs. Failure
had followed one (n = 15), two (n = 7), or three (n = 2) previous ext
ernal DCRs. Results: Mean duration of the surgery was 78.2 minutes. Su
ccess was achieved in 11 cases (46%; mean follow-up, 20 months). There
was no correlation between early loss of stents and failure. Three ca
ses had partial relief of symptoms. Three of the failures unsuccessful
ly underwent further TCLARDCR. Conclusions: The authors' success rate
of 46% with TCLARDCR compares poorly with the 85% success for external
revision DCR. With TCLARDCR, specific anomalies like the sump syndrom
e cannot be addressed adequately. There is a theoretical risk of canal
icular injury. Laser lacrimal surgery also is equipment dependent and
more costly than external DCR. The TCLARDCR cannot be recommended for
revision DCR using the Nd:YAG laser (Lasersonics, Milpitas, CA).