An analytical, numerical, and experimental study of backscattering from multiscale soil surfaces

Citation
F. Mattia et al., An analytical, numerical, and experimental study of backscattering from multiscale soil surfaces, RADIO SCI, 36(1), 2001, pp. 119-135
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences","Eletrical & Eletronics Engineeing
Journal title
RADIO SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00486604 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
119 - 135
Database
ISI
SICI code
0048-6604(200101/02)36:1<119:AANAES>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to investigate the backscattering from multi scale soil surfaces through a comparison of analytical model predictions wi th numerical computations and experimental data. A numerical simulation of the backscatter from multiscale surfaces is performed in order to assess th e sensitivity of the radar backscatter to the multiscale effect as a functi on of the roughness range of the surfaces, the polarization, and the incide nce angle of the impinging electromagnetic wave. The numerical backscatteri ng coefficients are compared with those obtained using the traditional inte gral equation method (IEM) as well as those obtained using a novel version of the IEM which has been adapted to model the backscattering from multisca le surfaces (MLS IEM). As a result, the surface conditions under which the traditional IEM can still predict well the backscatter from multiscale surf aces as well as the conditions under which traditional IEM fails are derive d. Subsequently, 25 m long roughness profiles collected over the Marestaing test site located near Toulouse, France, are analyzed in order to estimate input parameters for the two versions of the IEM model. Then, a comparison is made between the single-scale IEM and MLS IEM predictions and ERS synth etic aperture radar (SAR) data acquired over the site. The results show tha t over medium-rough soils (i.e., harrowed soils) the SLS IEM is in good agr eement (within 1 dB) with ERS SAR data, whereas MLS IEM underestimates the measurements of 2-3 dB. In contrast, over very smooth soils (i.e., rolled s oils) the MLS IEM is in overall better agreement with ERS SAR data than SLS IEM. The latter overestimates the measurements of 3 dB.