This case study assesses the implications of rhetorical style in dialogues
by Thomas Becon and his contemporary, Desiderius Erasmus. Becon imitated an
Erasmian theme but rejected Erasmus' classically oriented rhetoric and the
epistemology it advanced. Instead, he used the dialogue form as a vehicle
for what is primarily an oral (homiletic) exhortation, which reveals a prof
oundly different approach to the pursuit of truth and illustrates the widen
ing cultural gap between moderate and radical religious reformers.