Topiramate in clinical practice (part 2). Multicentric, retrospective evaluation of its tolerability.

Citation
P. Genton et A. Biraben, Topiramate in clinical practice (part 2). Multicentric, retrospective evaluation of its tolerability., REV NEUROL, 156(12), 2000, pp. 1120-1125
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
ISSN journal
00353787 → ACNP
Volume
156
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1120 - 1125
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-3787(200012)156:12<1120:TICP(2>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Randomized, controlled studies of new antiepileptic drugs are carried out f ollowing strict rules and do not always predict the drug's tolerability in clinical practice. The authors gathered 361 cases of focal epilepsies treat ed with topiramate (TPM) as an add-on to other antiepileptic drugs prior to marketing, in order to retrospectively analyze the incidence of adverse ef fects (AE). These patients had been treated by neurologists in a clinical s etting, with free choice of associated drugs, titration and final daily dos e. Compared with controlled studies. TPM was titrated slowly (mean rate: 43 mg/week, vs 100-200), and was given at a lower final dose (296mg/d, vs 200 to 1000). This analysis shows that AE were less frequent and that TPM had a n original tolerability profile, with CNS-related AE, often combined in the same patient (somnolence: 16.1p. 100, fatigue: 11.9p. 100, mental slowing: 9.1p. 100, slurred speech: 2,2p. 100), and weight loss (14.7p. 100 of pati ents, mean 4.5kg or 6.6p. 100 of body weight). Severe AE were uncommon (psy chosis, I; skin rash, 2; urinary lithiasis, 2). Withdrawal of TPM was cause d by AE (13.6p. 100), lack of efficacy (8.3p. 100), aggravation of epilepsy (6.1p. 100) or by a combination of these (5p. 100). It is useful to use slo w titration. in order to allow the greatest possible number of patients to benefit from its efficacy as an add-on drug in the treatment of resistant f ocal epilepsies.