In accordance with dual-process theories of attitude change, we predict tha
t attitude judgements about unfamiliar objects are affected by the evaluati
ve inconsistency of relevant attributes. Drawing upon self-efficacy theory,
we further predict that individuals' perceived self-efficacy moderates the
effect of inconsistency on attitude latencies: Individuals with high perce
ived self-efficacy in regard to systematic processing are expected to persi
st in their judgmental process and to show deliberative processing when inf
ormation is inconsistent but not when it is consistently positive or consis
tently negative. Evaluatively consistent information should lead to an elim
ination of or even a reversal of this difference between high- and low-effi
cacy individuals. The results of two experiments are supportive of these hy
potheses.