J. Seghatchian et al., Statistical process monitoring of WBC-reduced blood components assessed bytwo types of software, TRANSFUSION, 41(1), 2001, pp. 102-105
BACKGROUND: Statistical process control is required for monitoring of the W
BC-reduction process. This study focused on some factors that may influence
the outcomes of statistical process monitoring, such as WBC-reduction tech
nologies, the anticoagulant used, and WBC-counting technologies, by using t
wo types of software.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected from January to September 199
9, before the implementation of universal WBC reduction. The effects of thr
ee major factors were investigated: methods of preparation, the addition of
EDTA to the sample, and the WBC-counting technologies used (microvolume fl
uorimetry, flow cytometry, and Nageotte chamber). The WBC-reduction process
capability was assessed by two types of software, EZQC (Gambro BCT) and NW
A (Northwest Analytical). In addition, the differences between various sets
of results were compared by the t test or ANOVA.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference (at the 0.05 level of signific
ance) in WBC content when the three types of platelets in citrate samples w
ere compared with EDTA samples. In general, the Nageotte chamber appeared t
o count the lowest, and microvolume fluorimetry appeared to count lower tha
n flow cytometry There were minor but significant methodologic differences
between the software packages. However, these differences had negligible ef
fects on the percentage of conforming components at both <1 x 10(6) and <5
x 10(6) WBCs per unit.
CONCLUSION: Only the counting technologies were sufficiently different to w
arrant consideration. This difference may make unacceptable the interchange
of results obtained from various counting methods.