Increases in the distribution and abundance of white-tailed deer (Odocoileu
s virginianus) throughout much of their range, coupled with hunter accessib
ility limitations, have prompted many state wildlife agencies to consider t
he future effectiveness of hunting as a population control mechanism under
current regulatory systems. Wildlife managers in many areas experiencing ab
undant deer are questioning the conditions under which public hunting sen e
s to control deer populations. In this article, we evaluate the performance
of hunting as a deer population control mechanism and propose criteria to
assess the effectiveness of public hunting for that purpose across the land
scape, including rural and developed areas. We conclude that to control dee
r populations across broad landscapes, many wildlife agencies will have to
adopt hunting regulations that are robust to 3 conditions: decrease in hunt
er numbers, increase in refugia that limit hunter access to deer, and incre
ase in importance of urban and suburban areas as elements of deer range. To
stabilize or reduce the high-density deer populations currently existing a
cross much of white-tailed deer range, regulations need to give hunters inc
entives to shoot antlerless deer voluntarily or simply require them to do s
o. It is likely that comprehensive population control programs of the futur
e will combine general recreational hunting regimes that promote great per-
hunter harvests of antlerless deer across broad scales with completelementa
ry documentary, site-specific, highly regulated hunts and programs to dimen
sions refugia created by hunting-access limitations. Recreational hunting s
ufficient as the sole management tool for most urban and suburban control m
ethods will be part of integrated strategies for developed sites York data
to illustrate ideas presented in this paper to assess utility of hunting pr
ogram to control deer populations across broad landscapes.