The most widely used method to determine diets of carnivores is seat analys
is, which allows the identification of prey species from teeth, bones, feat
hers, and the cuticular scale and medullary characteristics of hair found i
n seats. Because the influence of observer bias in seat analysis has not be
en addressed, our objective was to compare analyses of the same gray wolf (
Canis lupus) seat samples by 3 observers to estimate error attributable to
individual observer bias. We found significant observer bias when comparing
detection of prey types and percentage of occurrence found by multiple obs
ervers who analyzed 1,002 seats. It is important that observers be trained
to thoroughly dissect and examine seats and use a reference collection.