Recent advances in detailed topographic data availability and computing pow
er have caused researchers to scrutinize their use of scale and resolution
in their study designs. We undertook this study to determine whether 100-m
resolution elevation data would accurately delineate the quality of desert
bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) habitat for females compared to 30-
m resolution elevation data. We examined 3 eastern Mojave Desert mountain r
anges to determine which resolution best categorized the habitat of female
desert bighorn sheep. For each mountain range, locations of females had a s
ignificantly less Land Surface Ruggedness index (LSRI) value and significan
tly less average habitat classification value at 100-m than at 30-m resolut
ion. Seventy-six percent of habitat classifications for females did not cha
nge from one data resolution to the other. In addition, although there was
a significant overall difference in habitat-quality ratings between resolut
ions, there was very little differentiation in proportion of landscape desi
gnated as good or excellent habitat (30 m = 27.5%, 100 m = 26.6%), Although
30-m resolution data may be more desirable because of a finer grain of res
olution, 100-m data derived from 3-arc-second data yields similar results,
is available for more areas, and provides adequate detail to grossly catego
rize habitat of desert bighorn females.