An evaluation of research on the effects of timber harvest on bird populations

Citation
R. Sallabanks et al., An evaluation of research on the effects of timber harvest on bird populations, WILDL SOC B, 28(4), 2000, pp. 1144-1155
Citations number
134
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
ISSN journal
00917648 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1144 - 1155
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-7648(200024)28:4<1144:AEOROT>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
We reviewed 95 studies (published from 1972 to 1997) that examined relation ships between timber harvest and populations of songbirds and cavity-nestin g birds. We critique the way in which studies have been conducted, evaluate their usefulness to forest managers, and suggest new directions of study, The number of bird-forestry studies conducted increased throughout our revi ew period and most appeared in The Journal of Wildlife Management (24%) and U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service technical publications (19%) . More studies (32%) have occurred in the northeastern United States than e lsewhere and most have examined effects of clearcutting (53%). Researchers typically collect data on all bird species, especially songbirds (78%), usi ng common sampling protocols such as point-count surveys, line transects, a nd spot-mapping techniques to assess relative avian abundance (55%) and den sity(32%). Few studies (13%) measured avian demographic parameters such as nest success or survivorship. Most studies (68%) lasted only 1-2 years; onl y 7 (7%) lasted >4 years. Most studies (27%) had only one replicate/treatme nt. Research on effects of timber harvest on bird populations has been limi ted to mensurative (observational) studies in which treatment effects canno t be inferred statistically. Most research is correlational (84%) and does not address cause-and-effect relationships. Incorporating experimental trea tments to provide pre- and post-timber-harvest comparisons is rare (16%). F uture research should: 1) be more long-term; 2) incorporate rigorous experi mental designs in which treatments are assigned randomly and better replica ted; and 3) although difficult, measure parameters related to avian fitness and population viability. Rather than only documenting observed patterns, researchers need to focus on identifying causal mechanisms that can be tran slated into meaningful management recommendations to enhance conservation o f forest avifauna.