Together weak? Separated strong? Girls and coeducation

Citation
Dh. Rost et C. Pruisken, Together weak? Separated strong? Girls and coeducation, Z PADAGOG P, 14(4), 2000, pp. 177-193
Citations number
84
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE
ISSN journal
10100652 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
177 - 193
Database
ISI
SICI code
1010-0652(200012)14:4<177:TWSSGA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Results of (in most cases) quasi-experimental studies concerning mixed-sex or single-sex schooling are inconsistent. Many reported much less than effe cts much greater than of coeducation vs, single-sex education are probably due to self-selection of school types (by pupils or their parents). The pre sent study examines the effects of coeducation vs. single-sex schooling on facets of academic self-concept, sex-role orientation, leisure time interes ts and intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivational orientation. In order to contro l the self-selection of school type, only students of private secondary sch ools (belonging to the same denomination) were investigated. The sample (N = 649) consists of four groups: (a) girls of a girls' school, (b) girls of single-sex classrooms in coeducational schools and (c) girls and - addition ally - (d) boys of coeducational classrooms in the same schools. Findings r eveal only sex differences but no effects of coeducation vs, single-sex edu cation at all. This is attributed to the successful control of the factor m uch less than self-selection much greater than. Thus, in comparison to inst ructional influences the relevance of the grouping variable much less than coeducation much greater than vs. single-sex education,, is regarded as neg ligible.