Efficacy, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of stavudine,nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir as salvage regimen after ritonavir or indinavir failure

Citation
Jl. Casado et al., Efficacy, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of stavudine,nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir as salvage regimen after ritonavir or indinavir failure, AIDS RES H, 17(2), 2001, pp. 93-98
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES
ISSN journal
08892229 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
93 - 98
Database
ISI
SICI code
0889-2229(20010120)17:2<93:ETAPOT>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The high rate of protease inhibitor treatment failure in clinical cohorts m akes it necessary to define novel salvage therapies. In a prospective study of 31 HIV-infected patients included in a salvage regimen with stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir, viral load decreased a median of 1. 65 log(10) and 1.95 log(10) after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectivel y, and 35 and 56% of patients had an HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml at th e same time points. At baseline, the mean number of mutations in the protea se gene was 10 (2-19), and the V82A and L90M mutations were present in 54 a nd 21% of patients, The presence of the V82A mutation did not affect signif icantly the rate of response (36 vs. 38%), whereas the L90M mutation was as sociated with treatment failure (0 vs. 43%), Plasma trough levels of nelfin avir (NFV) and saquinavir (SQV), in a twice daily dosing regimen, were abov e the protein-corrected IC95 in most patients despite the addition of an en zymatic inducer such as nevirapine, and peak levels were 2- and 5-fold incr eased with respect to standard doses. However, pharmacokinetics of saquinav ir-hard gel capsule (SQV-hgc) did not improve significantly in the three ti mes daily dosing regimen. In conclusion, the combination of stavudine, nevi rapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir increased plasma drug levels and produce d an adequate virological response in patients who had failed indinavir or ritonavir therapy. This degree of response is not significantly decreased i n the presence of genotypic mutations associated with indinavir/ritonavir ( IDV/RTV) resistance.