Critical analysis of histologic criteria for grading atypical (dysplastic)melanocytic nevi

Citation
L. Pozo et al., Critical analysis of histologic criteria for grading atypical (dysplastic)melanocytic nevi, AM J CLIN P, 115(2), 2001, pp. 194-204
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Volume
115
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
194 - 204
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Low concordance in grading atypical (dysplastic) melanocytic nevi (AMN) has been reported, and no systematic evaluation is available. We studied 123 A MN with architectural and cytologic atypia (40 associated with atypical-mol e syndrome), classified according to standard criteria by 3 independent obs ervers. Histologic variables included junctional and dermal symmetry latera l extension, cohesion and migration of epidermal melanocytes, maturation, r egression, nuclear features nuclear grade, melanin, inflammatory infiltrate location, and fibroplasia.;AMN (43 junctional and 80 compound) were graded mild (31), moderate (61), and severe (31). AMN-severe correlated with 3 or more nuclear abnormalities (especially pleomorphism, heterogeneous chromat in, and prominent nucleolus) and absence of regression, mixed junctional pa ttern, and suprabasilar melanocytes on top of lentiginous hyperplasia. AMN- severe diagnostic accuracy was 99.5% using these criteria, but only the abs ence of nuclear pleomorphism differentiated AMN-mild from AMN-moderate. No architectural features distinguishing AMN-mild from AMN-moderate were selec ted as significant by the discriminant analysis. AMN from atypical-mole syn drome revealed subtle architectural differences, but none were statisticall y significant in the discriminant analysis. Histologic criteria can reliabl y distinguish AMN-severe but fail to differentiate AMN-mild from AMN-modera te. AMN from atypical-mole syndrome cannot be diagnosed using pathologic cr iteria alone.