Analysis of microphthalmia transcription factor expression in normal tissues and tumors, and comparison of its expression with S-100 protein, gp100, and tyrosinase in desmoplastic malignant melanoma

Citation
Kj. Busam et al., Analysis of microphthalmia transcription factor expression in normal tissues and tumors, and comparison of its expression with S-100 protein, gp100, and tyrosinase in desmoplastic malignant melanoma, AM J SURG P, 25(2), 2001, pp. 197-204
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
01475185 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
197 - 204
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-5185(200102)25:2<197:AOMTFE>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Microphthalmia transcription factor (Mitf) is a nuclear protein involved in the development of melanocytes and the regulation of melanin synthesis. Re cent studies have suggested that Mitf may be a more sensitive and specific melanocyte marker than S-100 protein and gp100. However, there is insuffici ent knowledge on the specificity of Mitf, and a systematic examination of i ts use for the recognition of desmoplastic melanoma has not yet been perfor med. In this study, we compared the expression of Mitf with S-100 protein, gp100, and tyrosinase in 20 desmoplastic melanomas by using the antibodies D5 (anti-Mitf). anti-S100P, HMB-45 (anti-gp100), and T311 (anti-tyrosinase) . All 20 melanomas were positive for S-100 protein, 7 were positive for Mit f, 6 for gp100, and 11 for tyrosinase. To examine the specificity of Mitf, a panel of normal tissue and 386 samples of miscellaneous tumors. including dermal and subcutaneous spindle cell lesions relevant for the differential diagnosis of desmoplastic melanoma, were examined by immuno-histochemistry . Furthermore, normal tissue samples were tested for Mitf mRNA by reverse t ranscriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR). Immunoreactivity For Mitf was seen not only in melanocytes of normal skin, but also in macrophages, l ymphocytes, fibroblasts, Schwann cells, and smooth muscle cells at various sites, and tumors derived thereof. Our results indicate that the antibody D 5 lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity for widespread diagnostic us e. Especially in re-excisions, when immunohistochemistry is often needed to distinguish an inflamed scar tissue from tumor, the presence of immunoposi tive inflammatory cells and fibroblasts limits the diagnostic use of D5.