Arbib et al.'s comprehensive review of neural organization, over-relies on
modernist concepts and restricts our understanding of brain and behavior. R
eliance on terms like coding, transformation, and representation perpetuate
s a "black-box approach" to the study of the brain. Recognition is due to t
he authors for attempting to introduce postmodern concepts such as chaos an
d self-organization to the study of neural organization. However, confusion
occurs in the implementation of "biologically rooted" schema theory in whi
ch schemas are viewed as computer programs. The inclusion of an additional
functional level between structure and dynamics is unnecessary in a postmod
ernist perspective of brain and behavior.