Sw. Gangestad et Ja. Simpson, Trade-offs, the allocation of reproductive effort, and the evolutionary psychology of human mating, BEHAV BRAIN, 23(4), 2000, pp. 624-644
This response reinforces several major themes in our target article: (a) th
e importance of sex-specific, within-sex variation in mating tactics; (b) t
he relevance of optimality thinking to understanding that variation; (c) th
e significance of special design for reconstructing evolutionary history; (
d) the replicated findings that women's mating preferences vary across thei
r menstrual cycle in ways revealing special design; and (e) the importance
of applying market phenomena to understand the complex dynamics of mating.
We also elaborate on three points; (1) Men who have indicators of genetic f
itness may provide more direct benefits when female demand for extra-pair a
nd short-term sex if very low; (2) both men and women track ecological cues
to make mating decisions; and (3) more research on female orgasm is needed
.