In peripheral blood the majority of circulating monocytes present a CD14(hi
gh)CD16(-) (CD14(++)) phenotype, while a subpopulation shows a CD14(low)CD1
6(+) (CD14(+)CD16(+)) surface expression. During haemodialysis (HD) using c
ellulosic membranes transient leukopenia occurs. In contrast, synthetic bio
compatible membranes do not induce this effect. We compared the sequestrati
on kinetics for the CD14(+)CD16(+) and CD14(++) monocyte subsets during hae
modialysis using biocompatible dialysers. Significant monocytopenia, as mea
sured by the leucocyte count, occurred only during the first 30 min. Howeve
r, remarkable differences were observed between the different monocyte subs
ets. CD14(++) monocyte numbers dropped to 77 +/- 13% of the predialysis lev
el after 15 min, increasing to greater than or equal to 93% after 60 min. I
n contrast, the CD14(+)CD16(+) subset decreased to 33 +/- 15% at 30 min and
remained suppressed for the course of dialysis (67 +/- 11% at 240 min). Ap
proximately 6 h after the end of HD the CD14(+)CD16(+) cells returned to ba
sal levels. Interestingly, the CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes did not show reboun
d monocytosis while a slight monocytosis of CD14(++) monocytes was occasion
ally observed during HD. A decline in CD11c surface density paralleled the
sequestration of CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes. Basal surface densities of impor
tant adhesion receptors differed significantly between the CD14(+)CD16(+) a
nd CD14(++) subsets. In conclusion, during HD the CD14(+)CD16(+) subset rev
ealed different sequestration kinetics, with a more pronounced and longer d
isappearance from the blood circulation, compared with CD14(++) monocytes.
This sequestration kinetics may be due to a distinct surface expression of
major adhesion receptors which facilitate leucocyte-leucocyte, as well as l
eucocyte-endothelial, interactions.