Lm. Mancinelli et al., The pharmacokinetics and metabolic disposition of tacrolimus: A comparisonacross ethnic groups, CLIN PHARM, 69(1), 2001, pp. 24-31
Objective: Our objective was to compare the intravenous and oral pharmacoki
netics of tacrolimus among subjects of three different ethnic backgrounds,
African American, white, and Latin American.
Methods: Ten African American, 12 white, and 12 Latin American subjects rec
eived intravenous and oral tacrolimus in an open-label, two-period, paralle
l group study. All of the subjects received intravenous tacrolimus (0.015 m
g/kg) as a constant infusion over 4 hours and oral tacrolimus capsules (5 m
g) as single doses in randomized order. Concentrations of tacrolimus and it
s metabolites were measured in whole blood with the use of a validated HPLC
-mass spectrometry assay.
Results: There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameter
s among the three study groups after intravenous administration of the drug
s. After oral administration, the tacrolimus maximum concentration was sign
ificantly lower (P < .01) in the African American subjects (20.8 <mu>g/L) t
han in the white subjects (37.8 mug/L) and Latin American subjects (33.0 mu
g/L). Absolute bioavailability was significantly lower (P = .01) in the Afr
ican American subjects (11.9%) and in the Latin American subjects (14.4%) t
han in the white subjects (18.8%). After the oral dose, the area under the
plasma concentration-time curve was lower in the African American subjects
(179 mug/L.h, geometric mean) than in the white (293 mug/L.h) and Latin Ame
rican subjects (239 mug/L.h, differences not statistically significant). Ma
ximum concentration (P < .02) and area under the plasma concentration-time
curve (not statistically significant) of the main tacrolimus metabolite 13-
O-desmethyl tacrolimus was lower in the African American subjects than in t
he white and Latin American subjects.
Conclusions: Significant differences in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics exist a
mong the three different ethnic groups. Our results indicate that this may
result from differences in intestinal CYP3A or P-glycoprotein activities.