Pharmacokinetics of nicotine in healthy elderly people

Citation
L. Molander et al., Pharmacokinetics of nicotine in healthy elderly people, CLIN PHARM, 69(1), 2001, pp. 57-65
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
00099236 → ACNP
Volume
69
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
57 - 65
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9236(200101)69:1<57:PONIHE>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background: Mortality hazards of smoking extend well into later Life; this suggests that smoking cessation will continue to improve Life expectancy in older people. The pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of nicotine have not b een studied in elderly subjects, Drug disposition and pharmacodynamic respo nsiveness to nicotine may change with age, and conclusions founded on data from studies of younger populations may not apply to elderly populations. O ur aim was to assess the pharmacokinetics of nicotine in healthy elderly su bjects compared with healthy adults. Methods: Twenty healthy elderly subjects (age, 65-76 years) and 20 healthy adult subjects (age, 22-43 years) were given an intravenous infusion of 0.0 28 mg/kg of nicotine over 10 minutes. Nicotine and cotinine concentrations were measured in plasma and urine. Heart rate and blood pressure were monit ored. Results: For most adult and elderly subjects nicotine distributed according to a two-compartment system. Even though there was a large interindividual variation within and overlap between groups, nicotine total clearance (-23 %), nonrenal clearance (-21%), renal clearance (-49%), volume of central co mpartment (-37%), volume of distribution at steady state (-17%), and cotini ne renal clearance (-18%) were statistically significantly decreased in eld erly subjects compared with adults. Maximal heart rate response to nicotine was decreased in the elderly subjects (-29%), Conclusion: Even though statistically significant differences were observed , the disposition of nicotine does not seem to be changed to a clinically i mportant extent in elderly subjects compared with younger adults.