Sediment quality assessment survey and toxicity identification evaluation studies in Lavaca Bay, Texas, a marine superfund site

Citation
Rs. Carr et al., Sediment quality assessment survey and toxicity identification evaluation studies in Lavaca Bay, Texas, a marine superfund site, ENVIRON TOX, 16(1), 2001, pp. 20-30
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
ISSN journal
15204081 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
20 - 30
Database
ISI
SICI code
1520-4081(200102)16:1<20:SQASAT>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
A sediment quality assessment survey was conducted in Lavaca Bay, Texas, in proximity to a marine Superfund National Priority List (NPL) site. Previou s studies at this site had focused primarily on the degree and extent of me rcury contamination. The purpose of this survey was to determine the potent ial ecotoxicological impacts of contaminants, using sensitive sediment toxi city tests in conjunction with a comprehensive chemical analysis of the sed iments. In addition, phase I toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) studi es were conducted at several of the more toxic sites. Sea urchin (Arbacia p unctulata) fertilization and embryological development tests with sediment pore water were employed to assess the toxicity of the sediments. Elevated levels of mercury were found in a number of samples as much as 10-20 times that of background. Six stations had total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) concentration above the probable effect level (PEL) guideline value, and some stations had concentrations as much as 1000 times above background levels. Eighteen of the 24 stations exhibited toxicity in one of the toxic ity tests, while 14 stations were toxic in both tests. A number of stations within the fish closure area exceeded 8-16 of the PEL guidelines. Both aer ation and the C-18 column treatments were effective in reducing toxicity fr om the pore water of the two stations included in the TIE. This information , in conjunction with the fact that two of the four stations with the highe st mercury concentrations were not toxic, suggests that the toxicity observ ed in this study is primarily due to organics, probably PAHs, and not mercu ry. We recommend that these other contaminants of concern be considered in any remedial actions that are planned for this NPL site and that impacts on the ecosystem, as well as human health issues, also be considered. (C) 200 1 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.