Comparison of vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone (VBMCP) and interferon-alpha with melphalan and prednisone (MP) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with good-prognosis multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized study
K. Zervas et al., Comparison of vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone (VBMCP) and interferon-alpha with melphalan and prednisone (MP) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with good-prognosis multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized study, EUR J HAEMA, 66(1), 2001, pp. 18-23
Objectives. The purpose of the study was to evaluate, in a selected group o
f myeloma patients with favorable prognosis, the effect, on response and su
rvival, of polychymotherapy compared with melphalan prednisone. plus interf
eron in both arms. Methods: Eighty-nine previously untreated patients with
multiple myeloma and prognostic factors indicating a good prognosis were ra
ndomized to either oral melphalan plus prednisone (MP) in combination with
recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFN-alpha) or combination chemotherapy with
vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP
) alternating with rIFN-alpha. The two treatment groups were comparable in
terms of pretreatment characteristics. Results. The overall response rate w
as 67.4% (2.3% complete remission, 65.1% partial response) in the MP/IFN-al
pha group and 69.1% (14.3% complete remission, 54.8% partial response) in t
he VBMCP/IFN-alpha group (p = 0.59). There were no differences also in resp
onse duration and overall survival between the two treatment groups. The me
dian response duration was 39.1 months in the MP/IFN-alpha group and was no
t reached in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha group (p = 0.6). Overall survival was long
ill both treatment groups. The estimated 5-yr survival was 66% and 62% in
the MP/IFN-alpha and VBMCP/IFN-alpha group, respectively (p = 0.8). Toxicit
y was modest and treatments were well tolerated. Neutropenia (WHO grade 3 o
r 4) was higher, but not statistically significant, in the VBMCP/IFN-alpha
group. Conclusions: The results of the study show that in myeloma patients
with good prognosis, combination chemotherapy alternating with interferon-a
has no advantage over conventional MP plus interferon-alpha, in regard to
response rate, response duration, and overall survival of patients.