The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the fourfold magnifica
tion mammography (direct magnification, DIMA) technique would perform bette
r than conventional 1.5-fold magnification mammography in the differentiati
on of breast microcalcifications into benign and malignant. Fifty patients
with non-palpable microcalcifications detected by mammography were examined
immediately prior to surgical biopsy using both a conventional (1.5-fold)
and the DIMA (fourfold) magnification mammography techniques. The microcalc
ifications were classified by five experienced radiologists using morpholog
ical criteria. A receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis of
the sensitivity and specificity of both techniques in assessing malignancy
was then carried out.
The DIMA mammography technique was slightly but non-significantly superior
to the conventional method in detecting malignancy (p > 0.05). Coarse granu
lar and pleomorphic calcifications were detected more frequently with the D
IMA technique. Coarse calcifications were significantly more frequently ass
ociated with histologically benign findings, whereas fine granular calcific
ations were significantly more likely to be malignant lesions. Assessment o
f malignancy associated with microcalcifications using morphological criter
ia is not significantly improved by mammography techniques with higher magn
ification.